![did sofia pernas play in the mummy movies did sofia pernas play in the mummy movies](https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2020/08/tp-US-composite-twin-Justin-Hartley-and-Sofia-Pernas.jpg)
![did sofia pernas play in the mummy movies did sofia pernas play in the mummy movies](https://imagez.tmz.com/image/f2/4by3/2021/05/17/f210629dea7c4eefbf4f9206eee625ba_md.jpg)
Yes, just no connection has been played, the heroes would have to overcome its influence, show strength of character and everything like that, but they just mention it and its capabilities for granted, and they themselves seem to be completely independent. She controls insects, but people are not very much. And the influence is not played at all, neither at a distance, nor nearby. Since our villain is an otherworldly creature, then she must influence the actions of the heroes, even just by plot. The second not very written and played: the otherworldly line. Why does Nick do this in the film and not otherwise? Why is Jennifer important to him? Nothing in his behavior, nor in hers, speaks of raging feelings, or even nascent ones. Even the periodic squabbles of the heroes look not at all "cute scolds", but just quarrels, the desire of both to help each other also looks like a formula written in the plot, but not played by the actors. We have a gallant handsome Nick, a lively explorer Jennifer. There are a few other things that are not very well played and filmed. She is, of course, a physically strong villain, but morally completely boring, so you don't even believe in her power, in the local - yes, in the global - no. So it's not very interesting to look at a princess from a purely outward appearance in the present. wear and tear, time spares no one, even takes grace. And she wants to come up with something in her soul, some experiences and weaknesses, but they are not, and in this case, how does she differ from conventional zombies, which can be the main villains only in mass, because they are not individually interesting to anyone? The external contrast of the image of both the past and the present appearance is a little jarring: it was not an otherworldly charm that was added, but. The villain becomes almost a mechanism, and therefore loses its attractiveness to the viewer. This character suddenly becomes a soulless function from a living, without other aspirations and motives, except as the main one. The beginning, I confess, is impressive: a beautiful Egyptian princess, you can just admire, almost a tragic story, somewhat unsaid. Something went wrong with the main villain of the picture. And not to say that Tom directly played an egoist hero, again no, ironic - quite, but selfish - no, he is drawn to heroism again, there is not even much to describe, in my opinion, a complete lack of character. It's not that the actor can't cope with the role, it's just that this cliché is so strong that it is not so easy to overcome it. Tom plays well, but you don’t believe his character a single gram, well, it’s impossible to imagine for some reason that he is rather bad, but kind inside than just kind, so even the main character’s phrase about something like that looks fake.
Did sofia pernas play in the mummy movies skin#
In this picture, he is busy saving his own skin from the clutches of evil. His hero Nick is an ironic thief, smart, selfish enough and sometimes selfish. It so happened that we got used to him as a gallant hero, the winner of good over evil and the embodiment of all the good that can be imagined. There is one big surprise in this picture, bordering on bewilderment: the image of Tom Cruise. On the other hand, entertainment cinema is designed to entertain, so it is entertaining. It's a strange thing, the film was really exciting, interesting to watch, but returning my thoughts to it, I understand that there are many shortcomings that simply will not allow the film to be given a very high rating.